Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Simple example

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Simple example


chronological Thread 
  • From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT hcoop.net>
  • To: Adam Koprowski <adam.koprowski AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Re: Simple example
  • Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:42:18 -0500
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

Adam Koprowski wrote:
Still I completely miss why would Program be any inferior to refine for such examples, [...]

If you want to reason about your (transparent) definitions after you finish writing them, then [refine] is likely to be much more helpful than [Program]. The latter will add all sorts of coercions "behind the scenes." The program you write will in general not be the Gallina term that you end up with, and it's that Gallina term that you'd need to prove things about.





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page