coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables

From: muad <muad.dib.space AT gmail.com>
To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:14:48 -0800 (PST)
List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

> You can do it with an Ltac function that uses [type of] and [assert]

This is almost good enough, we just don't have a way (as far as I am aware)
of asserting (or cutting) such that the term you produce is not opaque in
the original context.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Instantiating-existential-variables-tp22390035p22392986.html
Sent from the Coq mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Taral
  - Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Adam Chlipala
    - Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, muad
      - Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Samuel E. Moelius III
        
        Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Adam Chlipala
  - Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Yves Bertot
    - Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Taral
    - Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Samuel E. Moelius III
      - Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, muad
        
        Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Instantiating existential variables, Arnaud Spiwack