coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: "Samuel E. Moelius III" <moelius AT cis.udel.edu>
- To: Edsko de Vries <devriese AT cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:41:54 -0400
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
Sorry, this was nonsense:
Samuel E. Moelius III wrote:
It appears that, at the prompt, ``induction 2'' invokes the following version of ``induction'' from page 176 of the 8.2 reference manual.
I realize now that you intended the version of ``induction'' described at the top of page 174.
I think that the following may be a work-around.
(*=======================================================================*)
Tactic Notation "my_induction" integer(n) :=
intros until n;
induction 0.
Inductive even : nat -> Prop :=
| even_zero : even 0
| even_succ : forall n, even n -> even (S (S n)).
Inductive weird : nat -> Prop :=
| weird_0 : weird 0
| weird_1 : weird 1
| weird_2 : weird 2
| weird_3 : weird 3.
Lemma foo0 : forall (n:nat), even n -> weird n -> True.
Proof.
my_induction 2.
(**)tauto.
(**)tauto.
(**)tauto.
(**)tauto.
Qed.
Lemma foo1 : forall (n:nat), even n -> weird n -> True.
Proof.
my_induction 1.
(**)tauto.
(**)tauto.
Qed.
(*=======================================================================*)
Still, it is odd that ``induction n'' doesn't just work.
Best,
Sam
- [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation, Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Thomas Braibant
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation, Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation, Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation, Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation, Edsko de Vries
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Samuel E. Moelius III
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation, Hugo Herbelin
- Re: [Coq-Club] Simple question about tactic notation,
Thomas Braibant
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.