coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Keiko Nakata <keiko AT kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- To: gonthier AT microsoft.com
- Cc: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:11:55 +0900 (JST)
- List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>
> CoInductive clock: Set := Tick (_ : clock).
> CoFixpoint ticks := Tick ticks.
> Definition foo := let: Tick _ as t := ticks return t = t in refl_equal _.
> Definition fubar := Eval compute in Some foo. (* Type error !! *)
> (** I fixed some typo :) **)
The error message says:
"Tick (cofix ticks : clock := Tick ticks) =
Tick (cofix ticks : clock := Tick ticks)" which should be coercible to
"(cofix ticks : clock := Tick ticks) = (cofix ticks : clock := Tick ticks)"
I could think the two terms are extensionally equal.
I have been looking for a way to forbid the intentional equality
on colists at all so that any predicate on colists shall not distinguish
bisimilar colists. That's why I am interested in "Add Relation colists
bisimilar".
Having a deep-embedded predicate language would be an option, which I am not
sure if I want.
Kind regards,
Keiko
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar, Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar,
Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar, Arnaud Spiwack
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar, Eduardo Gimenez
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar,
Eduardo Gimenez
- RE: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar,
Georges Gonthier
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar, Keiko Nakata
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar, Keiko Nakata
- RE: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar,
Georges Gonthier
- Re: [Coq-Club] Add Relation sequence bisimilar,
Keiko Nakata
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.