coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] Program: Measure based on more than one argument.

From: Adam Koprowski <adam.koprowski AT gmail.com>
To: coq-club <coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr>
Cc: Matthieu Sozeau <mattam AT mattam.org>
Subject: [Coq-Club] Program: Measure based on more than one argument.
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:12:58 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=VNfH/B5AJhuNL32WWkd+sypGxBwpGLWOSvqoqbyddmEjPI5md1S3w7+WAEb4ON0fWV hs9P7y7lGHOccQ3g+2qXepXI15UWNPxXBvLqTuWKsNWT7ND4Y1z314oSamdcIbtfvlAX tRR8TkETI+02WWyYJOLpqda7rhDRddnvpNduY=
List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

�� Dear all,

� Apologies for a silly question but I spent quite some time trying to figure it out on my own with no luck...
� How can I provide a measure annotation for a Fixpoint built using Program, if the measure depends on more than one argument? The following snippet worked just fine in the trunk (one day) but now I did not manage to achieve a similar effect with 8.2pl1 (not for the lack of trying):

Program Fixpoint test (e : exp | correct e) (s : string) { measure (build_pcx (e, s)) (pcx_lt) } : ...

�
�� Thanks in advance,
�� Adam

--
=====================================================
Adam.Koprowski AT gmail.com, http://www.cs.ru.nl/~Adam.Koprowski
The difference between impossible and possible
lies in determination (Tommy Lasorda)
=====================================================

[Coq-Club] Program: Measure based on more than one argument., Adam Koprowski
- Re: [Coq-Club] Program: Measure based on more than one argument., Matthieu Sozeau