Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - [Coq-Club] Declare Implicit Tactic

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] Declare Implicit Tactic


chronological Thread 
  • From: Bas Spitters <spitters AT cs.ru.nl>
  • To: coq-club AT pauillac.inria.fr
  • Subject: [Coq-Club] Declare Implicit Tactic
  • Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:32:58 +0200
  • List-archive: <http://pauillac.inria.fr/pipermail/coq-club/>

I am trying to use Declare Implicit Tactic.


It does not seem to work in my example, the corn division for real numbers.
So, I tried the example from the reference manual.


Parameter quo : nat -> forall n:nat, n<>O -> nat.
Notation "x // y" := (quo x y _) (at level 40).
(* Declare Implicit Tactic assumption.*)
Goal forall n m, m<>0 -> { q:nat & { r | q * m + r = n } }.
intros. exists (n//m).



As you can see the "Declare Implicit Tactic assumption" does not even seem to be needed. Can someone provide me with a real example?


Thanks,


Bas





Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page