coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adam AT chlipala.net>
- To: Pierre Courtieu <Pierre.Courtieu AT cnam.fr>
- Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle
- Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:43:37 -0500
Pierre Courtieu wrote:
Why not use comments to keep track failed attempts?
Pierre
2010/3/5 Damien
Pous<Damien.Pous AT ens-lyon.fr>:
2010/3/4 Pierre
Courtieu<Pierre.Courtieu AT cnam.fr>:
No this is not a bug. These commands are supposed to be used whenWhat about "Abort", which does not raise such a problem (I think) ?
using coq in a terminal. Using these command in coqide would
de-synchronize the "locked region" of the buffer and coq typing
environment.
(I find Abort quite useful, to keep track of failed attempts.)
That works well for most cases, but it's not so nice for preparing educational materials, such that you want your automated build process to check that the "failed attempts" still work as expected.
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle, catalin . hritcu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle, Catalin Hritcu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle,
Damien Pous
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle, Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle,
Pierre Courtieu
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reset Induction Principle,
Pierre Courtieu
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.