coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: AUGER <Cedric.Auger AT lri.fr>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] rewrite <- tactic
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:36:38 +0200
- Organization: ProVal
Hi all,
is there some particular reason why "rewrite <- H." does "apply eq_ind_r ..." and not "case H"?
I only see advantages using "case" instead of "rewrite <-":
* proof terms are more readable in general
* it seems it lightens type checking/skips computing a generalization of the goal
* it suppress a function call
For rewriting in hypotheses, it is lightly more complex, but realizable.
--
Cédric AUGER
Univ Paris-Sud, Laboratoire LRI, UMR 8623, F-91405, Orsay
- [Coq-Club] successor/predecessor on tree type, paul . tarau
- Re: [Coq-Club] successor/predecessor on tree type, Matthew Brecknell
- Re: [Coq-Club] successor/predecessor on tree type,
Taral
- Re: [Coq-Club] successor/predecessor on tree type,
Paul Tarau
- Re: [Coq-Club] successor/predecessor on tree type,
Taral
- [Coq-Club] rewrite <- tactic, AUGER
- Re: [Coq-Club] successor/predecessor on tree type,
Taral
- Re: [Coq-Club] successor/predecessor on tree type,
Paul Tarau
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.