Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] about the exercise 6.46 in Coq Art book

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] about the exercise 6.46 in Coq Art book


chronological Thread 
  • From: Pierre Casteran <pierre.casteran AT labri.fr>
  • To: Adam Chlipala <adam AT chlipala.net>
  • Cc: 许庆国 <qgxu AT mail.shu.edu.cn>, coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] about the exercise 6.46 in Coq Art book
  • Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:31:03 +0200

Quoting Adam Chlipala 
<adam AT chlipala.net>:
----------------------------


You never need to use tactics to write anything in Coq. I recommend avoiding tactics for anything that you think of as a "program," and using tactics for anything you think of as a "proof."

If you look at the script we proposed, the function we defined was an auxiliary
function for proving some theorem. So, I think it was it was "a part of a proof".

Pierre








Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page