coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adam AT chlipala.net>
- To: Nikhil Swamy <nswamy AT microsoft.com>
- Cc: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:58:36 -0500
Nikhil Swamy wrote:
Say I want to write this function (using the same definitions of A, B and foo
as below):
Definition bar (a:A) (b:B a) : (B a * unit) :=
(b, match a with
| One => foo b
| Two => tt
end).
An instance of what I call the convoy pattern in CPDT gives us this version:
Definition bar (a:A) (b:B a) : (B a * unit) :=
(b, match a return B a -> _ with
| One => foo
| Two => fun _ => tt
end b).
- [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?, Nikhil Swamy
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?,
Adam Chlipala
- RE: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?,
Nikhil Swamy
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?, Adam Chlipala
- RE: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?, Nikhil Swamy
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?, Adam Chlipala
- RE: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?,
Nikhil Swamy
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?, Guillaume Melquiond
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality-witnessing coercions?,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.