coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adam AT chlipala.net>
- To: Thomas Braibant <thomas.braibant AT gmail.com>
- Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:39:11 -0500
Thomas Braibant wrote:
I have a problem that can be reduced to the snippet below.
Section t.
Variable T : nat -> Type.
Variable f : forall n, T n -> Prop.
Goal forall n m (x : T n) (y : T m), f n (x).
intros.
match goal with
| v : T ?n |- context name [?v] => idtac v (* prints [f n x],
while I would like [x]*)
end.
End.
Hypothesis variable names are not treated as bound elsewhere in the same Ltac pattern. You can achieve what you want by nesting one [match] inside another, making each responsible for just one part of the pattern above.
- [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior, Thomas Braibant
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior,
Aaron B.
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior,
Aaron Bohannon
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior,
Thomas Braibant
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior, Aaron Bohannon
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior,
Thomas Braibant
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior,
Aaron Bohannon
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior,
Aaron B.
- Re: [Coq-Club] Strange Ltac behavior, Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.