coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- To: Daniel Schepler <dschepler AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Coq <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:20:58 -0400
Daniel Schepler wrote:
...and you need to use constructive_definite_description to construct induced functions on a quotient type. So yes, it's probably useless if you need things to be computable at the end.
[constructive_definite_description] is proved as a theorem without relying on axioms, so where would the computation problems show up?
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, (continued)
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Andrej Bauer
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Andrej Bauer
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Adam Chlipala
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Andrej Bauer
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?, Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.