Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?


chronological Thread 
  • From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
  • To: Daniel Schepler <dschepler AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: Coq <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Where is the set theory?
  • Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:20:58 -0400

Daniel Schepler wrote:
...and you need to use constructive_definite_description to construct induced functions on a quotient type. So yes, it's probably useless if you need things to be computable at the end.

[constructive_definite_description] is proved as a theorem without relying on axioms, so where would the computation problems show up?



Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page