coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Victor Porton <porton AT narod.ru>
- To: Carlos Simpson <carlos AT unice.fr>, jose.grimm AT sophia.inria.fr
- Cc: Coq <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Your theory does not verify
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 03:36:02 +0400
- Envelope-from: porton AT yandex.ru
I downloaded a theory by Carlos Simpson and tried to compile it with Coq
83.pl2:
http://arxiv.ccsd.cnrs.fr/e-print/math/0402336v1
$ coq_makefile
..
$ make
Makefile:170: .depend: No such file or directory
rm -f .depend
coqdep -c -i -I . *.v *.ml *.mli >.depend
coqdep -c -I . -suffix .html *.v >>.depend
coqc -q -I . axioms
coqc -q -I . tactics
coqc -q -I . set_theory
File "./set_theory.v", line 278, characters 19-20:
Error: The reference T was not found in the current environment.
make: *** [set_theory.vo] Error 1
It is strange that it refers to some T defined nowhere.
We need to fix this error.
===
In the original theory of Carlos Simpson (as opposed to rewritten theory by
José Grimm) every type is a set.
Maybe I'm wrong but it seems to have the convenience that for example
Set->Set->Prop is a set and there was no need to write explicit type
conversions.
May we rewrite some of these libraries of theories to bring back that every
type is a set?
Is my proposal viable?
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
- [Coq-Club] Your theory does not verify, Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Your theory does not verify, Vincent Siles
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.