coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- To: Victor Porton <porton AT narod.ru>
- Cc: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Reasons for use = instead of <->
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:36:24 -0500
Victor Porton wrote:
Jose Grimm's GAIA inherited this mode of expressing equality for
propositions, as his work was based on the work of Carlos Simpson.
Now there exists:
Require Import Setoid.
It allows rewrite to work with <->.
Now we need to make a decision: Should we switch to using Setoid from standard
library and replace every = comparing propositions with <->?
Let me just suggest that this discussion may be too specific for coq-club. I don't believe many people here use that specific library.
I'm yet weak in imperative proofs scripts as I instead decided to learn the
declarative proof mode.
IMO, standard Ltac proving is the technique to learn. The declarative mode is much less mature and has many fewer users (I would be surprised if you could find 5 people on coq-club who are qualified to answer questions about it, compared to 100's for Ltac).
- [Coq-Club] Reasons for use = instead of <->, Victor Porton
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reasons for use = instead of <->, Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reasons for use = instead of <->,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reasons for use = instead of <->, Daniel Schepler
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reasons for use = instead of <->,
Carlos Simpson
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reasons for use = instead of <->, Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.