coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Erik Ernst <eernst AT cs.au.dk>
- To: Makarius <makarius AT sketis.net>
- Cc: <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:02:43 +0200
Den 13/04/2012 kl. 12.26 skrev Makarius:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>
>> Le 12/04/2012 19:30, Xavier Leroy a écrit :
>>> Short form: is there a tool / how would you go about writing a tool
>>> that, given the *statement* of a Coq theorem, shows all *definitions*
>>> involved in this statement, omitting all the stuff that contribute
>>> only to the *proof* of the theorem?
>>
>> This can be done in a plugin. I've attached a proof of concept.
>
> Stéphane seems to like the |> operator, which was intruced in Isabelle/ML
> in 1994 and later made its way into F#. See also
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dsyme/archive/2011/05/17/archeological-semiotics-the-birth-of-the-pipeline-symbol-1994.aspx
>
> Over the years, a few more variants of it were introduced that could also
> help OCaml and Coq people to express function application and composition
> concisely, without the extremism of the Haskell community in this respect.
>
> This is the essential starter kit in OCaml notation:
>
> let (|>) x f = f x
> let (|->) (x, y) f = f x y
>
> let (@>) f g x = g (f x)
> let (@->) f g (x, y) = g (f x y)
>
> The latter two are called #> and #-> in Isabelle/ML, but OCaml does not
> allow # in symbolic identifiers as it seems.
Considering the history it's worth noting something that happened a couple of
decades earlier than 1994: The language BETA has used this syntactic
structure for application since approx. 1977 (so a pipeline like the one
described on http://lorgonblog.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/pipelining-in-f/ is
very natural in BETA). In the design of BETA, Kristen Nygaard and his
co-workers specifically emphasized the benefits of aligning the order of
evaluation and the syntax, and it's actually a rather fundamental element in
the syntactic structure of this language. (If you want to check it out there
is "The BETA book" at http://www.daimi.au.dk/~beta/Books/index.html.)
best regards,
--
Erik Ernst -
eernst AT cs.au.dk
Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University
IT-parken, Aabogade 34, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem, Xavier Leroy
- Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem, Randy Pollack
- Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem,
Stéphane Glondu
- Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem,
Makarius
- History of backward application |> [Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem], Andreas Abel
- Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem, Erik Ernst
- Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem, Xavier Leroy
- Re: [Coq-Club] slicing along the statement of theorem,
Makarius
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.