coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Kristopher Micinski <krismicinski AT gmail.com>
- To: Bernard Hurley <bernard AT marcade.biz>
- Cc: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Equality of functions.
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:54:36 -0400
Have you seen:
http://coq.inria.fr/stdlib/Coq.Logic.FunctionalExtensionality.html
??
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Bernard Hurley
<bernard AT marcade.biz>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the following scenario, is it possible to prove the Lemma?
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Section test.
> Variables A B : Set.
> Variables f g : A -> B.
>
> Hypothesis Hyp1: forall a, f a = g a.
>
> Lemma test : f = g.
>
> End test.
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> The hypothesis is just the normal mathematical definition of the
> equality of two functions. But I can't figure out whether it is
> reasonable to expect to be able to prove the Lemma or whether one would
> need and extra axiom.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bernard.
>
- [Coq-Club] Equality of functions., Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality of functions.,
Adam Chlipala
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality of functions.,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality of functions., Jonas Oberhauser
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality of functions.,
Bernard Hurley
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality of functions., Kristopher Micinski
- Re: [Coq-Club] Equality of functions.,
Adam Chlipala
Archive powered by MhonArc 2.6.16.