coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Chantal Keller <chantal.keller AT wanadoo.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Coq's kernel reduction mechanism
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:17:43 +0200
Thanks Maxime, that was exactly what I was looking for.
Perhaps a short description of this reduction would be useful in the
reference manual.
Thank you again,
Le 17/10/2012 17:34, Maxime Dénès a écrit :
> Hello Chantal,
>
> Chapter 3 of Bruno Barras' thesis should be a good match ;) You can
> download it from his homepage, although it seems unreachable at the moment.
>
> Roughly speaking, the conversion test is implemented by interleaved
> reduction steps and term comparisons (as opposed to the VM which goes
> straight to normal form). The reduction is performed by a call by need
> abstract machine.
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> Maxime.
>
> On 17/10/2012 17:28, Chantal Keller wrote:
>> Dear Coq club,
>>
>> I am looking for information about the "standard" Coq's kernel reduction
>> mechanism. By this, I mean the mechanism involved in the conversion rule
>> when doing "Qed." (in usual proofs, ie. when the VM is not called). Can
>> you give me a pointer on its working?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
--
Chantal KELLER
- [Coq-Club] Coq's kernel reduction mechanism, Chantal Keller, 10/17/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Coq's kernel reduction mechanism, Maxime Dénès, 10/17/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Coq's kernel reduction mechanism, Chantal Keller, 10/18/2012
- Re: [Coq-Club] Coq's kernel reduction mechanism, Maxime Dénès, 10/17/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.