coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Jonas Oberhauser <s9joober AT gmail.com>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr, Math Prover <mathprover AT yahoo.com>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:48:03 +0200
Am 18.05.2013 03:29, schrieb Math
Prover:
Hi Coq-Club,
I've played with Coq for a few months now -- working through parts of Pierce's Software Foundations and Chlipala's CPDT, however despite proving some non-trivial theorems, I often feel that I don't understand "what's going on under the hood." What I'm looking for is the equivalent of * SICP's meta circular evaluator or * the epsilon-delta definition of derivatives If we view a 'state' as pair<list<hypothesis>, goal> Then there should be a minimal set of rules for deriving new 'states.' I'm looking for the minimal set of rules on top of which all valid proofs are built. Thanks! Hi Math prover, You should check the book Coq'Art, which I recall gives a very nice explanation of the theoretical framework of Coq. Kind regards, Jonas |
- [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Jonas Oberhauser, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Adam Chlipala, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Kristopher Micinski, 05/23/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Jonas Oberhauser, 05/18/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.