Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

[Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Math Prover <mathprover AT yahoo.com>
  • To: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
  • Subject: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq
  • Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 18:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bfkpUhvesSlIh9cRzr2SskCdJiUFFzyVzBD9fl34Rnl0QxzpMPO8s/euzHeJu7HsHRsArr2rXEBsoIbs07cwK3MA8tIUVh5pAwjHeuGor4MwbBSPc5D4WHb+8Z3zUsKbSMZgknKPgU/QUssifYgEbrDXpr/PB7fCPc54NtrYMlA=;

Hi Coq-Club,

  With apologies for my ignorance, can someone point me at the documentation for the core verifier of Coq?

  I've played with Coq for a few months now -- working through parts of Pierce's Software Foundations and Chlipala's CPDT, however despite proving some non-trivial theorems, I often feel that I don't understand "what's going on under the hood."

  What I'm looking for is the equivalent of
  * SICP's meta circular evaluator or
  * the epsilon-delta definition of derivatives

  If we view a 'state' as
  pair<list<hypothesis>, goal>
  Then there should be a minimal set of rules for deriving new 'states.'

  I'm looking for the minimal set of rules on top of which all valid proofs are built.

Thanks!



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page