coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Math Prover <mathprover AT yahoo.com>
- To: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 18:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bfkpUhvesSlIh9cRzr2SskCdJiUFFzyVzBD9fl34Rnl0QxzpMPO8s/euzHeJu7HsHRsArr2rXEBsoIbs07cwK3MA8tIUVh5pAwjHeuGor4MwbBSPc5D4WHb+8Z3zUsKbSMZgknKPgU/QUssifYgEbrDXpr/PB7fCPc54NtrYMlA=;
Hi Coq-Club,
With apologies for my ignorance, can someone point me at the documentation for the core verifier of Coq?
I've played with Coq for a few months now -- working through parts of Pierce's Software Foundations and Chlipala's CPDT, however despite proving some non-trivial theorems, I often feel that
I don't understand "what's going on under the hood."
What I'm looking for is the equivalent of
* SICP's meta circular evaluator or
* the epsilon-delta definition of derivatives
If we view a 'state' as
pair<list<hypothesis>, goal>
Then there should be a minimal set of rules for deriving new 'states.'
Thanks!
- [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Jonas Oberhauser, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Adam Chlipala, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Kristopher Micinski, 05/23/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Math Prover, 05/18/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Core Verifier of Coq, Jonas Oberhauser, 05/18/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.