coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Pierre-Marie Pédrot <pierre-marie.pedrot AT inria.fr>
- To: Floyd Lee <undecidable AT secureroot.com>
- Cc: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Provability of (proj_sig1 x) = (proj_sig1 y) -> x = y
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:01:26 +0200
On 02/06/2013 23:45, Floyd Lee wrote:
> Is this deceptively simple theorem provable in Coq's logic?
Your lemma implies in particular proof-irrelevance (take A to be unit
and the predicate to be any proposition), so no.
PMP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Coq-Club] Provability of (proj_sig1 x) = (proj_sig1 y) -> x = y, Floyd Lee, 06/03/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Provability of (proj_sig1 x) = (proj_sig1 y) -> x = y, Adam Chlipala, 06/03/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Provability of (proj_sig1 x) = (proj_sig1 y) -> x = y, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 06/03/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Provability of (proj_sig1 x) = (proj_sig1 y) -> x = y, Pierre-Marie Pédrot, 06/03/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Provability of (proj_sig1 x) = (proj_sig1 y) -> x = y, Christian Doczkal, 06/03/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Coq-Club] Provability of (proj_sig1 x) = (proj_sig1 y) -> x = y, Floyd Lee, 06/03/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.