coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: t x <txrev319 AT gmail.com>
- To: Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu>
- Cc: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again)
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:34:03 -0700
Thanks for your patience. My previous notation is terrible and I have changed it a bit.
I believe https://gist.github.com/anonymous/7112657 fixes both issues on line 22.
Is there anything still wrong with this?
Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Adam Chlipala <adamc AT csail.mit.edu> wrote:
On 10/22/2013 09:57 AM, t x wrote:No, there are still issues.
Is https://gist.github.com/anonymous/7100956 correct?
Where error (1) is fixed at line 18 and error (2) is fixed at line 21.
- You can't just write "typeof(Di)"; it's necessary to extend the typing context with variables "y*_*" of appropriate types.
- On the same line, you substitute "u_i" for "x_i", which can't be right, because "u_i" is independent of which pattern has matched. You need to use the type of "Cn" to figure out the right terms to substitute.
- [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), t x, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Pierre Boutillier, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Pierre Boutillier, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Adam Chlipala, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), t x, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Adam Chlipala, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), t x, 10/23/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Adam Chlipala, 10/23/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), t x, 10/23/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Adam Chlipala, 10/23/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), t x, 10/23/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Adam Chlipala, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), t x, 10/22/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] one rule of dependent matching (again), Pierre Boutillier, 10/22/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.