coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Kristopher Micinski <krismicinski AT gmail.com>
- To: Bradford Larsen <brad.larsen AT gmail.com>
- Cc: coq club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:31:09 -0500
While this seems interesting as an academic pursuit, I wonder if it's at all practical. Are there any SAT solvers which don't also output certificates?
Kris
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Bradford Larsen <brad.larsen AT gmail.com> wrote:
Is there any work proving the correctness of the Tseitin transformation or other propositional logic transformations in Coq?More generally, I'm interested in seeing what existing work has been done on formalizing the algorithms used in SAT/SMT solvers.Thanks,Brad Larsen
- [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, Bradford Larsen, 12/04/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, Kristopher Micinski, 12/05/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, Bradford Larsen, 12/05/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, Guillaume Melquiond, 12/05/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, Chantal Keller, 12/05/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, J. Ian Johnson, 12/04/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, J. Ian Johnson, 12/05/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, Kristopher Micinski, 12/05/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of SAT solver-related problems?, Kristopher Micinski, 12/05/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.