coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Edwin Westbrook <westbrook AT kestrel.edu>
- To: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:20:50 -0800
Hi,
Does anyone know if the following lemma is provable in Coq? I am perfectly
happy to use functional extensionality, or even stronger axioms, as I am
already using informative excluded middle:
Lemma pi_eq_to_app_eq A B B' :
(forall (x:A), B x) = (forall (x:A), B' x) ->
(fun x => B x) = (fun x => B' x).
Thanks in advance!
-Eddy
- [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Edwin Westbrook, 12/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Jason Gross, 12/14/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Edwin Westbrook, 12/16/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Jason Gross, 12/16/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Edwin Westbrook, 12/16/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Anthony Bordg, 12/17/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Edwin Westbrook, 12/16/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Jason Gross, 12/16/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Edwin Westbrook, 12/16/2013
- Re: [Coq-Club] From equality of foralls to equality of their bodies, Jason Gross, 12/14/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.