coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Mitchell Wand <wand AT ccs.neu.edu>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Cc: Peter.Sewell AT cl.cam.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of Ott alpha-equivalence?
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:57:00 -0400
Ahh, thanks. That looks very useful.
--Mitch
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Francesco Zappa Nardelli <francesco.zappa_nardelli AT inria.fr> wrote:
Hi Mitch,That semantics of the binding structures of Ott is described in detailThe JFP version (JFP 2010) of the Ott paper (ICFP 2007) contains a worked-out definition of alpha-equivalence for terms whose binding structures are defined in Ott.
in the note:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/ott/bind-doc.pdf
with definitions formalised in Ott itself and paper proofs of some
sanity properties. It should be easy to generate a Coq version of the
definitions - we did some work towards that at the time, and we could
give you the Ott sources if you want. But we didn't do mechanised
proofs of the metatheory.
-francesco
- [Coq-Club] Formalization of Ott alpha-equivalence?, Mitchell Wand, 03/11/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of Ott alpha-equivalence?, Francesco Zappa Nardelli, 03/12/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of Ott alpha-equivalence?, Mitchell Wand, 03/12/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of Ott alpha-equivalence?, Frédéric Blanqui, 03/12/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] Formalization of Ott alpha-equivalence?, Francesco Zappa Nardelli, 03/12/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.