coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Karen Sargsyan <karsar AT ibms.sinica.edu.tw>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:17:29 +0800
Asking Ubuntu people was a joke, as I'll compile it faster. Anyway, you are right and I use long-term stable Ubuntu.
I've never tried to compare how fast are developments for Coq and Ubuntu. It's something good to know, before
complaining. Thank you for sharing.
Karen
On 4/22/14, 9:08 PM, Adam Chlipala wrote:
If you're using the latest long-term stable Ubuntu as of last month (12.10), then it makes sense that they would include Coq 8.3, since 8.4 was unfortunately released only two months before that Ubuntu version, probably not allowing enough time for proper packaging & testing to be included in a stable release. Coq is still really research software and changes at a pace greater than the one that mainstream Linux distros are effectively assuming.
On 04/22/2014 09:04 AM, Karen Sargsyan wrote:
Thank you. I see that it's better to ask Ubuntu people why they keep such an old version in their repository:)
Or just compile it myself at the end. Anyway, if someone knows what exactly happened between two versions that causes
such behavior, I'm curious to know.
Karen
On 4/22/14, 8:51 PM, Adam Chlipala wrote:
Perhaps the important missing piece of information here is that 8.3 and 8.4 are effectively different "major versions" of Coq, in terms of the extent of reorganization that is common when adding 0.1 or more to a Coq version number. It won't surprise me if you're just seeing the result of a big standard-library refactoring. Coq 8.3 was first released in 2010, and it's rather out of date today, regardless of the patch level.
On 04/22/2014 08:44 AM, Karen Sargsyan wrote:
If I do the following sequence on Ubuntu with Coq 8.3pl4 (ocaml 3.12.1):
Coq < Require Export ZArith.
Coq < Definition any: Z:= Z.div 2 3.
then result is: "Error: The reference Z.div was not found in the current environment"
On Mac OS X with 8.4pl2 OCaml 4.00.1 it defines "any".
So apparently there is some incompatibility between 8.3pl4 and 8.4pl2 in case of ZArith (something knows).
Is it so, or it's a bug in Ubuntu Coq package?
- [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Karen Sargsyan, 04/22/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Adam Chlipala, 04/22/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Karen Sargsyan, 04/22/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Adam Chlipala, 04/22/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Karen Sargsyan, 04/22/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Adam Chlipala, 04/22/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Karen Sargsyan, 04/22/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] bug or something else?, Adam Chlipala, 04/22/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.