coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Robbert Krebbers <mailinglists AT robbertkrebbers.nl>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:49:48 +0100
On 11/11/2014 08:51 PM, Vadim Zaliva wrote:
It looks like the paper, class SemiRing define differently from theTry "SemiRing" with capital "R".
actual definition in the library. According to the paper
definition of SemiRing (page 10) I should be able to define Scalar
Product of two vectors like this:
Definition ScalarProd `{Semiring A} {n} (a b: t A n) : A :=
fold_right (plus) (map2 (mult) a b) zero.
For what it is worth, I would only depend on the ring operations that you actually use, i.e.:
Definition ScalarProd `{Plus A, Zero A, Mult A} {n} (a b: t A n) : A :=
fold_right (+) (map2 (.*.) a b) 0.
- [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Vadim Zaliva, 11/09/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Abhishek Anand, 11/09/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Vadim Zaliva, 11/11/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Abhishek Anand, 11/11/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Robbert Krebbers, 11/11/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Vadim Zaliva, 11/11/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Vadim Zaliva, 11/11/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Vladimir Voevodsky, 11/09/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] algebraic hierarchy, Abhishek Anand, 11/09/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.