coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland
Chronological Thread
- From: Pierre Courtieu <Pierre.Courtieu AT cnam.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 10:38:05 +0000
Nice indeed, but again the point of the slides is more of "how much time will it take to an experienced mathematician to complete this proof if he never use a proof assistant before". Georges is an experienced mathematician but he does not fulfill the other requirement :).
P.
Le Wed Nov 26 2014 at 11:30:31 AM, Cyril Cohen <cohen AT crans.org> a écrit :
Hi Coq Club,
On 25/11/2014 17:47, Frédéric Blanqui wrote:
> Hello. Here is a relatively short (150 lines) classical proof of the
> infinity of prime numbers. Best regards, Frédéric.
Eight month ago on the ssreflect mailing list, Georges Gonthier posted a
very short proof based on the ssreflect plugin and mathematical
components libraries. As the archives are public anyway
(https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/ssreflect/2014-04/msg00003.html), I
take the liberty to copy the code down here:
Lemma dvdn_fact m n : 0 < m <= n -> m %| n`!.
Proof.
case: m => //= m; elim: n => //= n IHn; rewrite ltnS leq_eqVlt.
by case/predU1P=> [-> | /IHn]; [apply: dvdn_mulr | apply: dvdn_mull].
Qed.
Lemma prime_above m : {p | m < p & prime p}.
Proof.
have /pdivP[p pr_p p_dv_m1]: 1 < m`! + 1 by rewrite addn1 ltnS fact_gt0.
exists p => //; rewrite ltnNge; apply: contraL p_dv_m1 => p_le_m.
by rewrite dvdn_addr ?dvdn_fact ?prime_gt0 // gtnNdvd ?prime_gt1.
Qed.
Best,
--
Cyril Cohen
- [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Gabriel Scherer, 11/25/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Frédéric Blanqui, 11/25/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Carst Tankink, 11/26/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Enrico Tassi, 11/26/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Cyril Cohen, 11/26/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Pierre Courtieu, 11/26/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Carst Tankink, 11/26/2014
- Re: [Coq-Club] (user experience report) "Proof assistants as routine tools", Neil Strickland, Frédéric Blanqui, 11/25/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.