coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: George Van Treeck <treeck AT yahoo.com>
- To: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:41:59 +0000 (UTC)
I'm a software engineer and could use some advice from real mathematicians on how Coq proofs should be included with an AMS journal article.
I have written a article with less formal proofs for human consumption paired with Coq-based proofs for machine consumption.
Without Coq-based proofs the paper is only 10 pages, with Coq-based about 40 pages.
Being as Coq-based proofs are only intelligible at best by the Coq-literate, is the normal practice to:
a) Include long Coq-based proofs directly in article text?
b) Place long Coq-based proofs in an appendix?
c) Put a URL reference to the long Coq-based proofs in the text? If so, then where on the internet should the proofs be uploaded? As *.v files?
-George
- [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, George Van Treeck, 03/23/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, bertot, 03/25/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, George Van Treeck, 03/25/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, Dima Pasechnik, 03/26/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, George Van Treeck, 03/25/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, Pierre Courtieu, 03/26/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, Bas Spitters, 03/26/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, Pierre Courtieu, 03/27/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, George Van Treeck, 03/27/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, Frédéric Blanqui, 03/27/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, Bas Spitters, 03/26/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] AMS style question wrt Coq, bertot, 03/25/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.