coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Christian Doczkal <christian.doczkal AT uni-saarland.de>
- To: coq-club <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] admit, Qed, and Print Assumptions
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
Hello
I was just looking at the Changelog for Coq 8.5beta2 and I noticed the
following:
- A script using the admit tactic can no longer be concluded by either
Qed or Defined. In the first case, Admitted can be used instead. In
the second case, a subproof should be used.
Is this a temporary measure, or is there a principled reason why this cannot
work in Coq 8.5? I someties use this in combination with Print Assumptions to
get a quick overview of all the "holes" in some theorem.
--
Regards
Christian
- [Coq-Club] admit, Qed, and Print Assumptions, Christian Doczkal, 06/18/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] admit, Qed, and Print Assumptions, Guillaume Melquiond, 06/19/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] admit, Qed, and Print Assumptions, Enrico Tassi, 06/19/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.