coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Martin Escardo <m.escardo AT cs.bham.ac.uk>
- To: Bas Spitters <b.a.w.spitters AT gmail.com>, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine <p.l.lumsdaine AT gmail.com>
- Cc: Coq Club <coq-club AT inria.fr>, Homotopy Type Theory <homotopytypetheory AT googlegroups.com>, "Prof. Vladimir Voevodsky" <vladimir AT ias.edu>
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] [HoTT] Re: a question
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:47:41 +0100
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=m.escardo AT cs.bham.ac.uk; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=m.escardo AT cs.bham.ac.uk; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT sun61.bham.ac.uk
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
- Organization: University of Birmingham
On 28/09/15 09:42, Bas Spitters wrote:
> Thorsten will write a longer message, but there is OTT, going back to the
> work by Hofmann that Peter mentions:
> http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~psztxa/publ/obseqnow.pdf
I would additionally count cubical type theory
http://www.cse.chalmers.se/%7Ecoquand/face.pdf as precisely approaching
this, and more generally propositional and universe extensionality.
Martin
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine <
> p.l.lumsdaine AT gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Vladimir Voevodsky
>> <vladimir AT ias.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is it correct to say that the main problem in constructive type theory is
>>> to create a type theory that simultaneously satisfies two conditions:
>>>
>>> 1. the function extensionality principle
>>> 2. the principle of decidability of typing judgements
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Is it right that no such theory exists?
>>
>>
>> If I remember right, the theory of “intensional type theory with
>> extensional principles”, studied in Martin Hofmann’s thesis, has both of
>> these:
>>
>> http://www.lfcs.inf.ed.ac.uk/reports/95/ECS-LFCS-95-327/
>>
>> Specifically, he adds functional extensionality and (propositional) UIP to
>> a core intensional type theory, giving a theory he calls TT_I; and he shows
>> that the induced interpretation from TT_I into extensional type theory
>> (i.e. with the reflection rule) is conservative. This is Section 3.2.4–5
>> of the thesis.
>>
>> On the other hand, TT_I retains decidable type-checking — at least, I
>> recall him showing this, though on a very quick skim, I can’t now find
>> where he does. (I guess it follows from the decidability of the core
>> intensional type theory, since the extension adds no new definitional
>> equality rules, and so typechecking in the extension reduces to
>> typechecking in a context over the core?)
>>
>> Best,
>> –p.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to
>> HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe AT googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
--
Martin Escardo
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~mhe
- Re: [Coq-Club] a question, Pierre Courtieu, 09/01/2015
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [Coq-Club] a question, Vladimir Voevodsky, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] a question, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] [HoTT] Re: a question, Bas Spitters, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] [HoTT] Re: a question, Martin Escardo, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] [HoTT] Re: a question, Bas Spitters, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] a question, Jean-Francois Monin, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] a question, Thorsten Altenkirch, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] a question, Gabriel Scherer, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] a question, Andrew Polonsky, 09/28/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] a question, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, 09/28/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.