coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Freek Wiedijk <freek AT cs.ru.nl>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] VM/native mode within Coq
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:44:34 +0200
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=freek AT cs.ru.nl; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=freek AT cs.ru.nl; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT smtp1.science.ru.nl
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:F95XYBLe1BJ2IQAD6NmcpTZWNBhigK39O0sv0rFitYgUKf3xwZ3uMQTl6Ol3ixeRBMOAu64C1bKd6v+ocFdDyKjCmUhKSIZLWR4BhJdetC0bK+nBN3fGKuX3ZTcxBsVIWQwt1Xi6NU9IBJS2PAWK8TWM5DIfUi/yKRBybrysXNWC04Lpj6vrpNX6WEZhunmUWftKNhK4rAHc5IE9oLBJDeIP8CbPuWZCYO9MxGlldhq5lhf44dqsrtY4q3wD86Fpy8kVWqLjOq88ULZwDTI8Mmlz6te4mwPESF6h/HYRUS0pkxdEAgrGpEX0RJr8sQPxraxnxW+cOZulHvgPRT2+4vIzG1fTgyAdOmth/Q==
Dear all,
On the CakeML developers mailing list, there was a mention of:
<http://gallium.inria.fr/blog/coq-eval/>
Then Magnus wrote;
Interesting! So Xavier Leroy can run CompCert inside Coq at about
15 % of normal speeds, which of course is much better than we can
hope for with EVAL in HOL4.
I'd love to have fast evaluation mechanisms in HOL4. However,
support for evaluation in a VM/native mode would require
*significant* modifications to HOL4's trusted kernel...
I wonder what the trust issues are when computing with the
VM/native mode within Coq. The jumps into and out of the VM/native
mode sound scary regarding the trust story of the prover. Are
these VM/native-mechanisms in fact not trusted and somehow
cleanly separated from the trusted part of Coq's kernel?
And then I wondered how people on the Coq list feel about this,
and got permission from Magnus to repost his message here.
Freek
- [Coq-Club] VM/native mode within Coq, Freek Wiedijk, 09/30/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] VM/native mode within Coq, Bas Spitters, 09/30/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.