coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Dominique Larchey-Wendling <dominique.larchey-wendling AT loria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:54:32 +0100
- Organization: LORIA
Dear all,
May be it is a simple question, but is it possible to bound the Type
hierarchy to some finite number while compiling a proof. The goal
could be for instance to determine the least size of the hierarchy
for a proof to type-check ?
Another way to formulate the question is how can I know the maximum
n such that Type_n is needed in the type-checking of a given proof ?
Of course, this might imply that all the parameters have a fixed
Type index which could be obtained by replacing
forall (X : Type) ...
by
forall (X : Set) ...
for instance.
It seems to me that Set Printing Universes is not enough for that.
Dominique
- [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 12/08/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Robbert Krebbers, 12/08/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Guillaume Melquiond, 12/08/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 12/10/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Guillaume Melquiond, 12/10/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 12/10/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Guillaume Melquiond, 12/08/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Cedric Auger, 12/08/2015
- Re: [Coq-Club] Bounding the Type Hierarchy, Robbert Krebbers, 12/08/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.