coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Talia Ringer <tringer AT cs.washington.edu>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Impredicativity of Prop
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:30:25 -0800
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=tringer AT cs.washington.edu; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=tringer AT cs.washington.edu; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-yw0-f182.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:KBiYGxD20uYsKUpB05xVUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP7/pMbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakU1KyL4+u5AjdIyK3CmU5BWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/niKbvq9aKOF4ArQH+SI0xBS3+lR/WuMgSjNkqAYcK4TyNnEF1ff9Lz3hjP1OZkkW0zM6x+Jl+73YY4Kp5pIYTGZn9Kq8/VPlTCCksG2Ez/szi8xfZHiWV4X5JbmwSkxMAOQnD4xzgFsPtqCr8uedn8CKBe9L/VrA1Xzu+6KEtRRP13nRUfwUl+X3a35QjxJlQpwis8kRy
Hi all,
Does anyone have a good resource to read about why Prop is impredicative, and why this is desirable? So far, I've found Adam Chlipala's Universes post and some answers to a stackexchange question. I'd like something a little more formal. For example, in the stackexchange post, Cody Roux notes:> The expressiveness gained by impredicativity is "reassuring" in the sense 99% of "reasonable"
> mathematics can be formalized with it, and it is known to be consistent relative to set theory. This
> makes it likely they won't weaken it to something like Agda, which only has predicative universes.
Similarly, Adam Chlipala's post has a few interesting examples of things we can do with impredicative Prop, but I'm interested in something broader and more formal. A research paper or talk would be great, if such a thing exists.
Thanks!
- [Coq-Club] Impredicativity of Prop, Talia Ringer, 02/24/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Impredicativity of Prop, roux cody, 02/24/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Impredicativity of Prop, Talia Ringer, 02/24/2016
- Re: [Coq-Club] Impredicativity of Prop, roux cody, 02/24/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.