The Coq mailing list

[Thorsten Altenkirch <Thorsten.Altenkirch AT nottingham.ac.uk>]

No that is not necessary. Partiality is an effect.

I have just submitted my abstract on this to Types. If it gets accepted I
will talk about this at Novi Sad.

Cheers,
Thorsten

On 29/02/2016 19:42, 
"coq-club-request AT inria.fr
 on behalf of Jonathan
Leivent" 
<coq-club-request AT inria.fr
 on behalf of 
jonikelee AT gmail.com>
wrote:

>Forgive my type-theory naiveté, but shouldn't we want some part of Coq
>to not be strongly normalizing, so that it is possible to express and
>reason about non-terminating functions?
>
>-- Jonathan
>





This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.