The Coq mailing list

[Beta Ziliani <beta AT mpi-sws.org>]

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Jacques-Henri Jourdan <jacques-henri.jourdan AT normalesup.org> wrote:

On 08/19/2016 02:01 PM, Ralf Jung wrote:

I found the old thread:
<https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/coq-club/2015-03/msg00168.html>

That explains what I am seeing as being the expected behavior.  People
have been asking for suggestions back then, so here they are ;)

My proposal here would be to only show axioms which are actually used by
a name exported by one of the modules passed to coqchk.

Names which are not exported are still available via qualified names when importing the module, so this makes sense to include them in the list (i.e., if you are allowed to import the module, then you get the power to use these axioms).

  Alternatively,
Program could provide means of importing the base functionality without
needlessly importing modules. What do you think?

But then how different is this from refine ?

Program uses a bidirectional type-inference mechanism. This is the main use of Program for me: a cleaner and bidirectional refine (cleaner in the sense that visually Program Definition foo : type := term. is nicer than Definition foo : type. refine (term).).

​

 

Kind regards,
Ralf