coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Kevin Sullivan <sullivan.kevinj AT gmail.com>
- To: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:12:14 -0400
- Authentication-results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=sullivan.kevinj AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=sullivan.kevinj AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-wr0-f171.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:NoJwQBWPVNLUqn9doiGFFU11s8DV8LGtZVwlr6E/grcLSJyIuqrYZRyCt8tkgFKBZ4jH8fUM07OQ6P+wHzFYqb+681k8M7V0HycfjssXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aSV3DMl8/LePsX4XWks6f1uao+pSVbR8CzG62Zqo3JxGrpy3QsNMXiM1sMPBi5AHOpy5rdvpXwytTOFaXngj14I/k54Nn9yVOsvRn9MNeUKP4V6s9RL1cSj8hNjZmt4XQqRDfQF7XtTMnWWIMn08QDg==
What aspect of the definition of [sig] in the standard library results in its first parameter being implicit.
Here's how it's defined:
Inductive sig (A:Type) (P:A -> Prop) : Type :=
exist : forall x:A, P x -> sig A P.
[A] is not implicit here.
Later on the definition includes this:
Arguments sig (A P)%type.
Now when using the standard library, I have to leave out the value of [A].
However, if I write my own re-implementation as follows, I still have to provide an explicit value for [A].
Module foo.
Inductive sig (A:Type) (P:A -> Prop) : Type :=
exist : forall x:A, P x -> sig A P.
Arguments sig (A P)%type.
Definition any_bp := sig dnabasepair (fun p: dnabasepair => True).
(* I have to explicitly provide the first [dnabasepair] parameter *)
End foo.
I know this is an elementary question on implicit parameters. I read the manual but didn't find the detail I need to understand what's going on here. Thanks.
- [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Kevin Sullivan, 09/14/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/14/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Kevin Sullivan, 09/14/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/14/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Pierre Courtieu, 09/15/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/15/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Maxime Dénès, 09/15/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Ralf Jung, 09/15/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/15/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/15/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/15/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Maxime Dénès, 09/15/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Soegtrop, Michael, 09/15/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Pierre Courtieu, 09/15/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Easy question re: implicit parameters, Guillaume Melquiond, 09/14/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.