Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

coq-club - Re: [Coq-Club] Detail regarding induction

coq-club AT inria.fr

Subject: The Coq mailing list

List archive

Re: [Coq-Club] Detail regarding induction


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Dominique Larchey-Wendling <dominique.larchey-wendling AT loria.fr>
  • To: coq-club AT inria.fr
  • Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Detail regarding induction
  • Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:33:13 +0200 (CEST)

Rewrite your goal as forall k n m, k = n+m -> P k
and proceed by inducxtion on k (might work)
but any predicate Q k n m st k = n+m -> Q k n m 
will do (if the induction hypothesis is too weak)

Dominique


De: "Kevin Sullivan" <sullivan.kevinj AT gmail.com>
À: coq-club AT inria.fr
Envoyé: Samedi 28 Octobre 2017 07:00:44
Objet: [Coq-Club] Detail regarding induction

Why is it that when one does "induction (n + m)", the context for the first subgoal (where n + m = 0) does not contain n + m = 0 as an assumption?





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of Page