coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Dominique Larchey-Wendling <dominique.larchey-wendling AT loria.fr>
- To: coq-club AT inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Coq-Club] Detail regarding induction
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 09:33:13 +0200 (CEST)
Rewrite your goal as forall k n m, k = n+m -> P k
and proceed by inducxtion on k (might work)
but any predicate Q k n m st k = n+m -> Q k n m
will do (if the induction hypothesis is too weak)
Dominique
De: "Kevin Sullivan" <sullivan.kevinj AT gmail.com>
À: coq-club AT inria.fr
Envoyé: Samedi 28 Octobre 2017 07:00:44
Objet: [Coq-Club] Detail regarding inductionWhy is it that when one does "induction (n + m)", the context for the first subgoal (where n + m = 0) does not contain n + m = 0 as an assumption?
- [Coq-Club] Detail regarding induction, Kevin Sullivan, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] Detail regarding induction, Dominique Larchey-Wendling, 10/28/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.