coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Chris Brinkley <Chris.Brinkley AT sslmda.com>
- To: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: RE: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 06:07:43 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=Chris.Brinkley AT sslmda.com; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=Chris.Brinkley AT sslmda.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mx0a-00142601.pphosted.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:TPG7Zx/A2+ipsP9uRHKM819IXTAuvvDOBiVQ1KB+2+8cTK2v8tzYMVDF4r011RmSAtWdtqoMotGVmp6jcFRI2YyGvnEGfc4EfD4+ouJSoTYdBtWYA1bwNv/gYn9yNs1DUFh44yPzahANS46tL2HV9ze56idXERHiPyJ0IP70E8jclY7/g+u14tjYZxhCrDu7e7J7ahus+1b/rM4T1KBiMKcqgjHTo31Lf+lHjTdDJUiShFDW/Ma2/5pu4gxLoPYk+8cGWqL/KfdrBYdEBSgrZjhmrPbgsgPOGFOC
I tried adding (setq coq-prog-name "~/opam-coq.8.6/4.01.0/bin/coqtop") to
init.el.
Emacs seems to accept the initialization and I no longer get the error
executing interactively, but I still get an error compiling a file containing
a "Set Warnings" command , which makes me doubt if ProofGeneral is using coqc
8.6, even though it now seems to be using coqtop 8.6.
Is there an analogous way to control the coqc version ProofGeneral will use?
Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> You can customize coq-prog-name; alternatively, make sure that running
> coqtop in your shell runs the right version of Coq.
> On 2017-10-27 23:28, Chris Brinkley wrote:
>> But now when I run the troublesome command from Software Foundations 5.3,
>> I still get the same error, which makes me think ProofGeneral is not
>> seeing the new Coq version.
________________________________
This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
the intended recipient, you should delete this message and any attachments.
- [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Gaëtan Gilbert, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Théo Zimmermann, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Gaëtan Gilbert, 10/28/2017
- RE: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Ralf Jung, 10/28/2017
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Chris Brinkley, 10/28/2017
- Re: [Coq-Club] New Coq version not seen by Proof General?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 10/28/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.