coq-club AT inria.fr
Subject: The Coq mailing list
List archive
- From: Siddharth Bhat <siddu.druid AT gmail.com>
- To: "coq-club AT inria.fr" <coq-club AT inria.fr>
- Subject: [Coq-Club] Reading material on "Program Fixpoint"
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 13:27:27 +0000
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=siddu.druid AT gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=siddu.druid AT gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster AT mail-qt0-f173.google.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
I've been trying to learn how to write dependently typed code in Coq.
As far as I can tell, there are three styles:The problem I face with #1 is that _proving_ things about Definitions encoded this way is impossible for me. For example, if I use omega in some Definition D, I cannot prove anything about D, because on unfolding D, I see the mess that is the omega implementation, I assume.
So, for proving things about definitions, #1 is out.
#2 is.. challenging, and as a newbie, I find that I often do not know how to express the things I want to say, or do not know how to convince Coq that certain things are impossible (eg: safe indexing into a vector)
So, for now, #3 seems easiest.
--
Sending this from my phone, please excuse any typos!
- [Coq-Club] Reading material on "Program Fixpoint", Siddharth Bhat, 01/20/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reading material on "Program Fixpoint", Merlin Göttlinger, 01/20/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reading material on "Program Fixpoint", Théo Zimmermann, 01/22/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reading material on "Program Fixpoint", Siddharth Bhat, 01/22/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reading material on "Program Fixpoint", Théo Zimmermann, 01/22/2018
- Re: [Coq-Club] Reading material on "Program Fixpoint", Siddharth Bhat, 01/22/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.