Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Laurent Thery <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 19:35:32 +0200
On 05/06/2014 07:29 PM, Beta Ziliani wrote:
+1
Actually, I think it would be much better to have a ssromega. I have
no idea how hard can it be to port omega to use ssrnat.
Cheers,
Beta
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Enrico Tassi <> wrote:
Hello, today I was asked if there is a bridge between the notions in
MathComp and the ones on which the "omega" tactic is able to work.
I would not be surprised if someone already wrote a bunch of Ltac to do
the conversion. If so, can you share it please?
Cheers
--
Enrico Tassi
As a matter of fact I think it would be better to target lia that is more flexible than
omega. Frederic Besson told me that it should be not much
work but still I haven' t found time to do the job.
--
Laurent
- [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Enrico Tassi, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Beta Ziliani, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Enrico Tassi, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Maxime Dénès, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Enrico Tassi, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Beta Ziliani, 05/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.