Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Maxime Dénès <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 13:59:30 -0400
I've always wondered (because I'm not using these things a lot), is there any reason to prefer omega over romega?
As to how to interface it, I guess the clean way to go would be to re-express these tactics over typeclasses supporting the required equational reasoning, as is now done for ring... Then supporting it in SSR would just be a matter of defining a typeclass instance.
Maxime.
On 05/06/2014 01:52 PM, Enrico Tassi wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:35:32PM +0200, Laurent Thery wrote:
As a matter of fact I think it would be better to target lia that is moreFor lia we have something to/from ssrint in the proof of Apery actually,
flexible than
omega. Frederic Besson told me that it should be not much
work but still I haven' t found time to do the job.
but is not bullet proof, it is an Ltac hack. You had something cleaner
in mind?
Ciao
- [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Enrico Tassi, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Beta Ziliani, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Enrico Tassi, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Maxime Dénès, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Enrico Tassi, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp, Beta Ziliani, 05/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.