Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Bas Spitters <>
- To: Laurent Thery <>, Nicolas Magaud <>, Laurent Fuchs <>
- Cc: Ssreflect-mailinglist <>
- Subject: Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:44:18 +0200
Yesterday over lunch we had a similar discussion whether omega/lia would work for non-standard arithmetic.
In theory it should of course, it is just another model of PA/HA. However, the backend may not be so flexible.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Laurent Thery <> wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [ssreflect] omega and mathcomp Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 20:04:52 +0200 From: Laurent Thery <> To: Maxime Dénès <>
On 05/06/2014 07:59 PM, Maxime Dénès wrote: > I've always wondered (because I'm not using these things a lot), is > there any reason to prefer omega over romega? > The implementation is a matter of taste (reflexive or not) but from what I recall they don' t solve exactly the same goals so you can' t replace blindly one by the other.
- [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Bas Spitters, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/07/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Bas Spitters, 05/07/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/07/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Bas Spitters, 05/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.