Subject: Ssreflect Users Discussion List
List archive
- From: Laurent Thery <>
- To: Bas Spitters <>, Nicolas Magaud <>, Laurent Fuchs <>
- Cc: Ssreflect-mailinglist <>
- Subject: Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 10:50:10 +0200
On 05/06/2014 10:44 PM, Bas Spitters
wrote:
Yesterday over lunch we had a similar discussion whether
omega/lia would work for non-standard arithmetic.
In theory it should of course, it is just another model of
PA/HA. However, the backend may not be so flexible. On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Laurent
Thery <>
wrote:
-------- Original Message -------- On 05/06/2014 07:59 PM, Maxime Dénès wrote: > I've always wondered (because I'm not using these things a lot), is > there any reason to prefer omega over romega? > The implementation is a matter of taste (reflexive or not) but from what I recall they don' t solve exactly the same goals so you can' t replace blindly one by the other. The base of omega and lia is Fourier Motzkin. That is clearly largely applicable. See for example my (old !) toy implementation. ftp://ftp-sop.inria.fr/marelle/Laurent.Thery/Fourier.zip Then there are different technique (cut, omega test) that take care of the discrete nature of things but you may not be interested by those. -- Laurent |
- [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Bas Spitters, 05/06/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/07/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Bas Spitters, 05/07/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Laurent Thery, 05/07/2014
- Re: [ssreflect] Fwd: Re: omega and mathcomp, Bas Spitters, 05/06/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.