Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: meng <qsmeng@126.com>
- To: "paul zimmermann" <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 22:13:53 +0800 (CST)
- Authentication-results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=qsmeng@126.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=qsmeng@126.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@m15-66.126.com
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:AlODmRM8nAs0U1wWiI4l6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIMzox0KPv5rarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsKIUzbGO+P+7EUU7or+/81k6OKRWUBEEjchE1ycBO+WiTXPBEfjxciYhF95DXlI2t1uyMExSBdqsLwaK+i760zceF13FOBZvIaytQ8iJ35TxjLj5pMabSj4LrQT+SIs6FA+xowTVu5teqqpZAYF19CH0pGBVcf9d32JiKAHbtR/94sCt4MwrqHwI6LoJvvRNWqTifqk+UacQTHF/azh0t4XXskyJVQKS4jMOU2ATnwBNCg7DplmuZp7stm3It+941TOfNMvwZbEyQzWrqalxHkzGkiACYjs09m6fwphpl6dWph2J/kYhhYXTZdfGZ7JFYqrBcIZCFiJ6VcFLWnkEW9vkYg==
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Dear Paul,
In cado-nfs2.2,you used method from your paper "better polynomial", where for different skewness, there exist many plolynomials. I obtain new polynomials by one polynomial subtracting another one and then select the one with smaller leading coefficient. usually these new polynomials will have smaller lognorm.
I just use version 2.2 and the command is cado.py N workdire
Best regards,
Meng
At 2016-03-31 15:07:36, "paul zimmermann" <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr> wrote: > Dear Meng, > >> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:19:11 +0800 (CST) >> From: meng <qsmeng@126.com> >> >> Dear Paul, >> Thank you for telling me how to configure these two parameters. >> For RSA120, by letting nrkeep=600 and ropteffort =10, and other parameters unchanged, I can obtain the polynomial with Murphy E=9.43. >> nrkeep=600 is too big, maybe I should make some further modification to low nrkeep. >> Thank you again. >> Best regards, >> Meng > >I am unable to reproduce this with CADO-NFS 2.2 nor with the git version. >Please tell me which version you used and which exact command line you used. > >Best regards, >Paul
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fine tuned task/stage control, Bill Winslow, 03/17/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fine tuned task/stage control, paul zimmermann, 03/17/2016
- Message not available
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: Fine tuned task/stage control, Bill Winslow, 03/18/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: Fine tuned task/stage control, paul zimmermann, 03/18/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: Fine tuned task/stage control, Bill Winslow, 03/18/2016
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters, meng, 03/23/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters, paul zimmermann, 03/23/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters, meng, 03/30/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters, paul zimmermann, 03/31/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters, meng, 03/31/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters, paul zimmermann, 03/31/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] how to configure parameters, paul zimmermann, 03/23/2016
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: Fine tuned task/stage control, paul zimmermann, 03/18/2016
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fwd: Fine tuned task/stage control, Bill Winslow, 03/18/2016
- Message not available
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Fine tuned task/stage control, paul zimmermann, 03/17/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.