Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Emmanuel Thomé <emmanuel.thome@inria.fr>
- To: Paul Leyland <paul.leyland@gmail.com>, <cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] A little light relief
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 19:44:41 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Alright, fair enough. :-)
E.
On September 3, 2019 7:07:28 PM Paul Leyland <paul.leyland@gmail.com> wrote:
You seem to surmise that the ETA would decrease linearly. That is not
true. We want the ETA to converge to the real finish time, and I see
above no indication that it won't be the case. Having an ETA that is way
way off at the beginning is totall expected. Indeed, it is computed based
on a linear fit of the computation progress *thus far*, e.g. with the
formula:
I suspect that someone doesn't understand British ironic humour.
_______________________________________________
Cado-nfs-discuss mailing list
Cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/cado-nfs-discuss
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] A little light relief, Emmanuel Thomé, 09/03/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] A little light relief, Paul Leyland, 09/03/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] A little light relief, Emmanuel Thomé, 09/03/2019
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] A little light relief, Paul Leyland, 09/03/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.