Discussion related to cado-nfs

[Ed Hall <ed_ka2fwj@yahoo.com>]

 Dear Paul,
You're right!  Although I had noticed the merge speedup, I didn't want to 
burden you with two "bugs" at the same time.(smile)  What differentiates 
between a bug and a feature?  I did, however, make note for the c137 that 
even though the filtering took longer, the overall wall time was shorter, 
which does mean other steps must have been faster.  But, please do keep me 
oriented in a positive direction.
My plan at this point, then, is to rerun the first c130 (earlier commit), but 
with the August 2020 commit, followed by the same c130 with the May21st 
commit.  Does that sound like it will meet the needs?  Will the clients need 
to be old or new for the May commit?

Sincerely,Edwin Hall

    On Tuesday, September 15, 2020, 6:01:41 AM EDT, 
cado-nfs-discuss-request@lists.gforge.inria.fr 
<cado-nfs-discuss-request@lists.gforge.inria.fr> wrote:  
 
 Send Cado-nfs-discuss mailing list submissions to
    cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/mailman/listinfo/cado-nfs-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    cado-nfs-discuss-request@lists.gforge.inria.fr

You can reach the person managing the list at
    cado-nfs-discuss-owner@lists.gforge.inria.fr

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Cado-nfs-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Newer Commit Takes Longer to filter (Paul Zimmermann)


----------------------------------------------------------------------