Subject: Discussion related to cado-nfs
List archive
- From: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr>
- To: Bernardo Boncompagni <bernardo.boncompagni@gmail.com>
- Cc: cado-nfs-discuss@lists.gforge.inria.fr
- Subject: Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 08:28:45 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/>
- List-id: A discussion list for Cado-NFS <cado-nfs-discuss.lists.gforge.inria.fr>
thank you Bernardo for your report. (In general, it is good to include also
the release of cado-nfs used, or the exact git commit used.)
With your files, I can reproduce the issue with dependencies 0 and 1.
However, dependency 2 works:
zimmerma@mure:/tmp/cado$ ~/svn/cado-nfs/build/mure/sqrt/sqrt -poly c110.poly
-prefix c110.dep.gz -dep 2 -t 1 -side0 -side1 -gcd
...
Alg(2): square root completed at 42.02s (wct 26.30s)
16254032875050544527560247991133579424804518417
70447936387834629629002635008176793377690777439436264857134749203
These dependencies fail: 0 1 3 4 9 10 11 12 13 17 18 20 23 24 26
These dependencies don't produce that error: 2 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 19 21 22 25
I was also able to reproduce the problem by running cado-nfs.py on your input
number. We'll investigate.
Paul
- [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Bernardo Boncompagni, 10/14/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Paul Zimmermann, 10/15/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Bernardo Boncompagni, 10/15/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Paul Zimmermann, 10/15/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Bernardo Boncompagni, 10/15/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Paul Zimmermann, 10/15/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Bernardo Boncompagni, 10/15/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Emmanuel Thomé, 10/21/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Bernardo Boncompagni, 10/21/2020
- Re: [Cado-nfs-discuss] Bug report, Paul Zimmermann, 10/15/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.