Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
- From: Johannes Otepka <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Multiple definition problem
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:41:02 +0100
Hi Ambroise,
I have seen these multiple definition errors on my windows maschine too. The problem is that the functions
VRML_2_ostream& operator<<(VRML_2_ostream& os, const char* s)
VRML_2_ostream& operator<<(VRML_2_ostream& os, const double& d)
are declared (rather than defined) in VRML_2_ostream.h. So all cpp-file including "VRML_2_ostream.h" will show up this multiple definition problem.
solution: make these two functions inline (inline VRML_2_ostream& operator<<(VRML_2_ostream& os, const char* s)....) and the problem is resolved.
I forgot to post the bug to the mailing list - which is done now ;-)
Cheers
Johannes
Sylvain Pion wrote:
Hi Ambroise,
Ambroise Krebs wrote:
Hi,
Well, I write here as I have a problem.
I was using CGAL-3.1 with Linux Ubuntu Hoary and everything was fine.
I upgraded to Linux Ubuntu Dapper and the compiler was not recognized for CGAL-3.1, so I changed it for CGAL-3.2.1.
I could install it without any problem, but when I compile a project that uses it (and that worked perfectly with CGAL-3.1), I get the following error:
.//libgeom.a(GenericObject.o): In function `CGAL::operator<<(CGAL::VRML_2_ostream&, char const*)':GenericObject.cc:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `CGAL::operator<<(CGAL::VRML_2_ostream&, char const*)'
geometry_test.o:geometry_test.cc:(.text+0x0): first defined here
.//libgeom.a(GenericObject.o): In function `CGAL::operator<<(CGAL::VRML_2_ostream&, double const&)':GenericObject.cc:(.text+0x28): multiple definition of `CGAL::operator<<(CGAL::VRML_2_ostream&, double const&)'
geometry_test.o:geometry_test.cc:(.text+0x28): first defined here
I really don't know what is wrong, did anybody else met this kind of problem before?
Any help would be appriciated.
What is libgeom.a and what is GenericObject.o ?
These do not come from CGAL, I think.
Also, note that sometimes install_cgal says a compiler is not supported,
while it actually works.
Best,
- Multiple definition problem, Ambroise Krebs, 01/09/2007
- Re: Multiple definition problem, Sylvain Pion, 01/10/2007
- RE: [cgal-discuss] Re: Multiple definition problem, Krebs Ambroise, 01/10/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Multiple definition problem, Johannes Otepka, 01/10/2007
- Re: [cgal-discuss] Re: Multiple definition problem, Sylvain Pion, 01/10/2007
- RE: [cgal-discuss] Re: Multiple definition problem, Krebs Ambroise, 01/11/2007
- Re: Multiple definition problem, Sylvain Pion, 01/10/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.