Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion
Chronological Thread
- From: "Max" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:41:20 +0800
- Disposition-notification-to: "Max" <>
- Organization: LoadCom
>> I know nothing about indexed item before. But it works quite well.
>
>That's good to know. Than there is an alternative to
>Exact_construction_excat_predicate_kernel. I'm curious about the
>performance.
I've tried with both Exact_predicates_exact_constructions_kernel and
Exact_predicates_inexact_constructions_kernel, with CGAL::SNC_indexed_items,
but neither even passed compile (on VS2003/SP1 or VS2005/SP1).
>
>> One more question, the program output 'Constructor not available for this
>> Kernel'
>> What does it mean? Could this message be ignored?
>
>This means that you called the constructor for creating a halfspace
>while you use a standard kernel. This constructor has can not work
>without an extended kernel.
Yes, after a deeper look, I realized that this message was issued by
a statement
Nef_polyhedron_3 N1(pl, Nef_polyhedron_3::INCLUDED);
with
typedef CGAL::Homogeneous<CGAL::Gmpzf> Kernel;
typedef CGAL::Nef_polyhedron_3<Kernel, CGAL::SNC_indexed_items>
Nef_polyhedron_3;
Yes, I just noticed the fact that all examples in the manual that use Nef_3
constructor this way are all using the extended kernel.
1) I changed the kernel from Homogeneous<CGAL::Gmpzf> to
Extended_homogeneous<CGAL::Gmpzf>
and had another run. But this time I got a runtime error. It happened in the
main program
at this statement:
Nef_polyhedron_3 N(P);
2) Despite of this problem, I recommend you add an explicit statement into
the doc
regarding this requirement/restriction (if there was not). :-)
>
>Peter
>--
>You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
>To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
>https://lists-sop.inria.fr/wws/info/cgal-discuss
>
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] interior(),closure()and boundary(), (continued)
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] interior(),closure()and boundary(), Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] interior(),closure()and boundary(), Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] interior(),closure()and boundary(), Peter Hachenberger, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3]interior(),closure()and boundary(), Max, 02/06/2008
- [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] Constructor not available for this Kernel, Max, 02/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] Constructor not available for this Kernel, Peter Hachenberger, 02/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simple question, Peter Hachenberger, 02/04/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/06/2008
- RE: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Stephen Wong, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.