Subject: CGAL users discussion list
List archive
Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion
Chronological Thread
- From: "Max" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:01:18 +0800
- Disposition-notification-to: "Max" <>
- Organization: LoadCom
Hello Peter
From what I get from your mail msg's, AFAIUC, there's
the following facts with relate to Nef_3:
1. To use half-space nef_3 ctor such as
Nef_polyhedron_3 N(Plane_3(1, 0, 0, -1), Nef_polyhedron_3::INCLUDED);
one should use extended kernel;
2. Don't use inexact kernels with Nef_3;
3. To play with Nef_3 with double type coordinates, one should
use SNC_indexed_items as the 2nd template parameter in instantiating
a Nef_3 type;
4. Extended kernels do not work together with SNC_indexed_items.
It seems that there's no choice, of combinition of Nef_3/kernel, for me
to meet these needs:
a) I need the half-space Nef_3 ctor; (that means I should used extended
kernel)
b) my coordinates is double type; (that means I should use SNC_indexed_items,
but it's
incompatible with extended kernel)
So this seems to be a deadlock. Is there any solution?
Many thanks for your help, Peter.
B/Rgds
Max
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3]interior(),closure()and boundary(), (continued)
- [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] Constructor not available for this Kernel, Max, 02/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] Constructor not available for this Kernel, Peter Hachenberger, 02/07/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simple question, Max, 02/04/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simple question, Peter Hachenberger, 02/04/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but stillsimplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex butstillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/06/2008
- Re: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/06/2008
- RE: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complexbutstillsimplequestion, Stephen Wong, 02/06/2008
- Re: RE: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A morecomplexbutstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/07/2008
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A morecomplexbutstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/07/2008
- Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A morecomplexbutstillsimplequestion, Max, 02/07/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Peter Hachenberger, 02/05/2008
- Re: Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simplequestion, Max, 02/05/2008
- Re: [cgal-discuss][Nef_polyhedron]A more complex but still simple question, Peter Hachenberger, 02/04/2008
- [cgal-discuss] [Nef_polyhedron_3] Constructor not available for this Kernel, Max, 02/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.